On 17-08-2012 16:49, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
I've tried to make a list of the implicit relations that I see, and I came to the following:
- hasTopology - hasNode - implementedBy - hasService - hasPort - hasLabel - hasLabelGroup - hasLink - locatedAt - existsDuring
Is that list complete?
In see https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6547: In the comment of August 8, I marked all implicit relations with a "*". There are two difference when comparing our two lists. My list includes "providesPort" and "providesLink" (which are used in Services). Also, in your list the relation <Node X> <Node Y> could both mean Node X --hasNode--> Node Y as well as Node X --implementedBy--> Node Y For that reason, "implementedBy" should be an explicit relation. Regards, Freek