W dniu 2012-10-25 17:31, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
Hi,
Hi Jeroen,
Very brief minutes of the call we had today:
Present: Roman, Aaron, Freek, Jeroen
- about two dozen views, but no responses yet on the NML schema draft - Roman will check layerencoding in the XML examples
Only 'groups-and-labels' example needed to be updated. Doing this I went through other files and noticed that the owl example file 'example-link-serialcompound' contains the nml elements which are used to organise the list but don't belong to the schema (they are not present in the schema). I'm talking about nml:ListItem, nml:item, nml:next. The consequence would be that the parser doesn't recognise them as nml elements. I'm not the owl expert but I think their definitions are missing. Roman
- use id for now, figure out the clashing yourself if present. use reference in a version 2 as a special relation A single document should be unambiguous and clear - make sure that we mention something along these lines in the security section. - Jeroen to checkout the definition of encoding in RDF - Freek will poke Andre for the Redmine transition - We will prepare an abstract for TNC2013, describing applications of NML, especially NSI. Jeroen will start with a structure after SC.
Next call will be after SC, on November 22nd. _______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg