W dniu 2012-04-04 13:14, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
Roman Łapacz wrote:
I'm not sure that we really need to have the inverse relation in all cases. I'm not against but maybe the types like "partofSerialCompoundLink" should be treated as extensions (different namespace of attribute, eg. nml-ext:type). This way the core set of types would be minimal (its values would be the most useful and popular). Roman, you're a proponent of allowing inverse relations.
Could you give a use case why we need it in the first place?
If I remember correctly our topology examples we usually used links containing ports/port references (shortly speaking). But our discussion with NSI showed that their aproach is different. The NSI topology is based on STPs/ports (using connectedTo). Switching from OWL into NML does not has to force NSI to change that approach. Use of Ports with isSink/isSource could be more intuitive for NSI. Roman
Thanks, Freek