8 Oct
2012
8 Oct
'12
12:58 p.m.
Hi, On 5 Oct 2012, at 14:48, Freek Dijkstra <freek.dijkstra@sara.nl> wrote:
Jeroen's proposal: "If there are 2 network elements with the same id attribute in a given document, the union of the two elements should be considered the canonical definition of the element"
Aaron's Rule 1: If there are 2 network elements with the same id attribute in a given document, the behavior is undefined.
I think so. Some questions for Aaron's approach: - If you have a big database with measurements and topology information, would that mean you can only ever describe a network element once? - How would you cope with updates and changes? Jeroen.