Jerry Sobieski wrote:
Before any decisions are made by NML group about NSI concepts, I would like to have a more time to understand the of detail these various issues - some seem pretty obvious, but others seem to be reference some prior discussions.
As always, if you have consideration or questions on a concept, do discuss it on the list. Some topics are new, we can postpose formal decisions while discussions last. That said, some things are non-controversial or have been discussed in the past and just need to be decided upon (e.g. write "nml:port" or "nml:Port", things like that), which I rather to soon. Also, I urge group members not to let a discussion get in the way of writing it down, providing examples, or even implementing a concept if it seems useful to you.
Freek- perhaps you and I could have another chat in the next couple days here? There are only a few things I want to understand in great detail - and these have to do with how the NSI concepts function within the integrated model.
I'm meeting over lunch to explain and review the XML examples with Jeroen and Roman. That may not be a good time for lengthy discussions, so any other time, you're welcome to find me for a listening ear. Freek