Re: [Nml-wg] Naming

Freek Dijkstra wrote:

Here comes the great part: we actually shouldn't define that. I think the goal of the NML-WG is not to dive in protocol and implementation details, like this. All we should do is come up with a good model, or ontology to describe networks. Well, if that's the case, then from the schema perspective, identifiers are completely opaque and we simply say they exist, must be globally unique and leave it at that. If that's the consensus, then I'll go along.

Cheers, Aaron