On 28-12-2012 13:23, Roman Łapacz wrote:
Thanks for the comments. I'll look at them closer in 2013 :) (next week).
Have a great new years eve. I was wondering this morning if the schema should make a distinction between a reference and a "inline" object description. I now think there is no difference in syntax: In both cases it is a object, with id, and optional other attributes and child elements. If you like I can go through it in more detail. Unfortunately, I'm not well versed enough to e.g. understand the difference between
<xs:complexType name="NetworkObject"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="relation" type="nml:RelationType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <xs:element name="parameter" type="nml:ParameterType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> <!-- .... --> </xs:sequence> <!-- .... --> </xs:complexType>
and
<xs:complexType name="NetworkObject"> <xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element name="relation" type="nml:RelationType" /> <xs:element name="parameter" type="nml:ParameterType" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Freek