W dniu 2012-10-22 14:14, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
Hi,
According to https://forge.ogf.org/sf/sfmain/do/go/artf6577 it should be encoding?
It seems 'encoding' is valid now. I'll update the XSD schema. I saw your updated topology file for the NSI demo (https://github.com/jeroenh/AutoGOLE-Topologies/blob/nsiv2/master.n3) and if you want to apply artf6577 the use of nmleth will have to be replaced with nml:label labeltype. Roman
Jeroen.
On 19 Oct 2012, at 16:34, Roman Łapacz <romradz@man.poznan.pl> wrote:
Hi Jeroen,
I noticed that the UML diagram (and the OWL schema) has 'encoding' attribute in PortGroup (the same for LinkGroup but in this case the OWL schema does not have it) but I remember clearly that we replaced it with 'layerencoding' attribute (I included this in the XSD schema). To be honest now I don't know what is valid (at the beginning it was 'encoiding', than 'layerencoding' and now again 'encoding'?) .
Roman
W dniu 2012-10-11 21:25, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
Hello all,
It is with great trepidation that I present to you a draft of the "Network Markup Language Base Schema version 1".
Please have a look through it and let us/me know what you think about this document.
With the feedback we get, we will improve the document and we plan to finally start the process on this document next month.
Thanks! Jeroen.
_______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg