Hi, W dniu 2012-07-10 22:27, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
<nsi:path> <!-- Two STP, each with a source and sink: a bidirectional path --> <nsi:STP> <Network>urn:ogf:network:cesnet.cz:2012:czechlight</Network> <!-- No VLAN specified: pick any one VLAN within these Port Groups. --> <source><nml:PortGroup>urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:nordunet-surfnet</nml:PortGroup></source> <sink><nml:PortGroup>urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2012:surfnet-nordunet</nml:PortGroup></sink> </nsi:STP> <nsi:STP> <Network>urn:ogf:network:sne.science.uva.nl:2012:lighthouse</Network> <!-- No VLAN specified: pick any one VLAN within these Port Groups. --> <source><nml:PortGroup>urn:ogf:network:sne.science.uva.nl:2012:lighthouse-egress</nml:PortGroup></source> <sink><nml:PortGroup>urn:ogf:network:sne.science.uva.nl:2012:lighthouse-ingress</nml:PortGroup></sink> </nsi:STP> </nsi:path>
Freek, in your examples sent to the NSI group you didn't use idRef attribute for nml:GroupPort (or nml:Port). It's a small thing but I think we should be strict to use accepted structures. To me using tag values for this is not supported by NML at the moment (if we had xsd or rnc schema this would be verified easily). Roman