Hi, On 26 Nov 2012, at 14:46, Freek Dijkstra <freek.dijkstra@sara.nl> wrote:
On 26-11-2012 14:43, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
1. Introduction (general idea, why a standardized topology desc is needed, bit of history, etc.) 2. (RL) Requirements (what the NML WG wanted to achieve: abstraction, multi-layer, multi-domain, extensions allowed, independent of the format - XML, RNC, OWL, others, etc.) 3. (RL) Schema Explanation (short description of the schema) 4. (JH) Standardisation under OGF (status and short description of OGF) 5. (JH) A use case of NML - Supporting Network Provisioning (topology in NSI) 6. Future Work (describe briefly plans for the future of NML)
I'm happy to write or contribute to 1, 2, 4 and/or 6. Let me know. Which of these shall I do? I have a preference for 1, 2 and 4.
1 is unclaimed so please do. 2 you can coordinate with Roman perhaps? If you can do 4 I can also do 6. Jeroen.