Hi Jason,
I tried to provide some comments in these issues. Thanks;
Thanks again. I noted that you put in the comment "This issue should be updated with the discussion from the mailing list" You are absolutely right, and I volunteer for the task to clean up the tracker items and copy & paste relevant comments that have gone on the mailing list. Jeroen already provided a great start listing the issues, and we are well aware that the discussions indeed need to be copied in still. For tomorrow's call only these four items are on the table https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6537 - Implicit relations https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6545 - serialCompoundLink https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6550 - source/sink Relations https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6542 - VLAN And these three are in working group last call: https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6534 - Case https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6539 - Inbound/Outbound Ports https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6538 - Verbs in relation-names My plan is to use the following status for each artifact: - New -- just entered, need proposal or discussion - Need proposal -- waiting for volunteer to write proposal(s) - Under discussion -- raise your voice - Need documentation - waiting for volunteer - Completed -- it is in the documentation - Rejected -- No volunteers can be found; may be reopened later I don't want a formal state machine (discussion can become before or after a proposal depending on how things go), but mostly I do want to streamline the process a bit. I have not added a "working group last call" status. Perhaps that's useful. I just changed the available statuses in the tracker, but have not updated the individual artifacts. I'll do so later. Let me know if this is helpful or not. Regards, Freek