Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Grouping is done slightly differently in XML and RDF:
Grouping in XML: Containment for elements.
Ordering: <NE> next <NE>
Grouping in RDF: <Group> contains <NE>
Ordered group is done using extra ListItem objects: <ListItem> item <NE> <ListItem> next <ListItem>
I presume for RDF you mean <Group> contains <ListItem> We also have the following grouping relations: <Node> implementedBy <Node> <Topology|Node> hasNode <Node> <Topology> hasTopology <Topology> <NE> hasService <Service> While updated the UML schema, I noted we are missing a few group-to-element relations: <BidirectionalPort> ????? <Port> <BidirectionalLink> ????? <Link> <Topology|Node> ????? <Link|LinkGroup> (NB: Node ---> Link is used for cross connects, in case that's not immediately obvious.) And with the recent LinkGroup and PortGroup we also need: <PortGroup> ????? <Port> <LinkGroup> ????? <Link> Can we use hasPort/hasLink for the 5 missing relations? <NE> hasPort <Port> <NE> hasLink <Port> Regards, Freek