Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6487 - Virtual Node concept
Both have been rejected, Virtual Node with the note that this can be described using the "implementedBy" relation.
So the status is "Complete", not Rejected.
https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6542 - VLAN Has been agreed upon, moved into Last Call. Some questions about return traffic being a switch feature, not a VLAN feature per se were raised. However, this is a minor issue and this is the best way to describe it.
AS mentioned in the call, I think it is possible to use this same syntax to describe return traffic as a switch feature. I will provide that, along with a definition of what "noReturnTraffic" means. In the mean time, I put the status to "need proposal" mostly as a reminder for myself I need to start writing. I most likely put it into last call next week. Freek