23 Aug
2011
23 Aug
'11
3:19 p.m.
Freek Dijkstra wrote:
All I was trying to suggest is that it occurs to me that d) would serve 3 out of the 3 requirements, and I was asking if someone on the list saw any serious problems with it. The only problems I have heard so far were that it (1) deviated from the solution in use for NMC, and (2)
Sorry, the following line was missing in my previous email: and (2) added one additional level of nesting to the XML messages. Freek