On Mar 13, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Roman Łapacz <romradz@man.poznan.pl> wrote:
W dniu 2013-03-12 20:50, Jeroen van der Ham pisze:
Hi,
For most of the NML model we have made it so that there is only one relation defined between two objects. However, Richard spotted a situation where we do have two:
- A Port can have a "hasService" relation to a SwitchingService - A SwitchingService can have a "hasInboundPort" relation to a Port
Perhaps it would make sense to suggest a preference that one of them must be there and that the other is optional. The second relation is slightly more informative, so that is probably better. Fine be me. TO DO for the schema.
Ditto Cheers, Aaron
Roman
Jeroen.
_______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg
_______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg