Freek, I am able to join the call, perhaps we can discuss the G.805 G.800 issue which is of interest to NSI group? Btw, You may be interested to hear that I am in the process of applying for DANTE membership for TMF. Guy -----Original Message----- From: Jason Zurawski [mailto:zurawski@internet2.edu] Sent: 30 July 2009 14:36 To: Freek Dijkstra Cc: Network Markup Language Working Group Subject: Re: [Nml-wg] Conference call Freek; Speaking for some of the Internet2 participants, it would be in our best interest to postpone the call for at least a week. We are under some fast approaching deadlines and would appreciate the delay. Thanks; -jason
At the previous call we decided to have the next call today:
Starting Time: Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, US/Eastern Duration: 1:00
To join both the web and audio conference (recommended), click here: https://edial.internet2.edu/call/0186145 If you only want to participate in the audio conference, you may dial in with the following numbers: Call: +1-734-615-7474 (PSTN CALL-OUT DOES NOT WORK) or +1-866-411-0013 (toll free US/Canada Only) Enter access code: 0186145
Jeroen and Chin reported that they are not able to attend. There have been two items on the task list (from Jeroen's mail July 10):
Most important points: - Next teleconference is on July 30th at the same time (16:00 european, 10:00 eastern). - Martin will submit his work on defining the schema in text before the next teleconference. - Freek will prepare some use-cases and examples on cross-connects and adaptations, so that we can get a sense of how the schema works.
I should be reprimanded for not have this ready earlier. I have a half-baked attempt of a use case on my computer right now, and will sent it later. I already did notice I'm missing the concept of
There are a few other items to discuss: - John Vollbrecht has recently looked in detail to G.800 for the NSI (I am mostly familiar with G.805, a predecessort). If John attends I'm curious to hear his opinion. - Recently I have been approached by another standardisation body that did some work on our topic (they have a UML representation to describe network topology and looked at hypergraphs). While academic institutes are welcome to join for free, their standards are not available for free. How do others feel about this? I did look at the OGF guidelines, but it is not explicit. - Paola Grosso did a few (very) minor changes to deliverable #1 based on comments (I promised this over a month ago, finally, she did - THANKS!). I like to sent it to the OGF editor. Are people familiar with the procedure (I'm not entirely). - Should be try to get urn:ogf: delegated from IANA and urn:ogf:network delegated from the OGF? Is that a task for us to do?
Regards, Freek Dijkstra
nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg