31 Jul
2012
31 Jul
'12
8:59 a.m.
On 31 Jul 2012, at 10:48, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
It seems that either "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml/" or "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml#" will do.
Most namespace pick the hash, do you know why?
No, but I'm guessing it has to do with the "rdf:id" construct, combined with the HTML fragment identifier feeling more natural.
What is a "hierarchical namespace" and how does it differ from a "non-hierarchical namespace"?
I have no idea, I was just reproducing what was in the RDF standard. Frankly, I was surprised it was there.
(PS: I personally still prefer http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml# over http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml#, despite GFD.84. Probably because I'm used to it).
Ehm, which one over which? Jeroen.