Hi, On 16 Jan 2013, at 14:24, Freek Dijkstra <Freek.Dijkstra@surfsara.nl> wrote:
On 15-01-2013 01:54, Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
Missing items: * nml:canProvidePort relation
This does not seem to be in the doc or XML schema either? Did we define that?
It was discussed on the mailing list between Sep 28 and Oct 5.
It is in the document since Dec 8: http://redmine.ogf.org/projects/nml-wg/repository/revisions/24456d9507f50203...
My apologies, I was using an outdated subversion version. It's in now, and I've updated the schema to reflect this.
* hasLabelGroup
The Domain is currently a PortGroup only, but I see no fundamental reasons not to allow adding labels to a LinkGroup.
Done.
The range of isSerialCompoundLink is now changed to OrderedList (was: List). However, looking at the example section in the document, the OrderedList object is not used, but the ListItem object as follows:
Updated.
That brings me to another issue: where should the following objects be defined: * ListItem object * next relation * item relation
I had some text that was at the top of the OWL schema. I've moved that a subsubsection of the Syntax discussion at the end of the Schema section. This also makes it normative. Jeroen.