I also vote A. If we don't put the right 'building blocks' in from the beginning, I think we are in danger of not having the seamless upgrade path Chin mentioned. So it is important to me that we get the model for how different layers/technologies relate to each other. But, of course we are not defining those layers. jeff On Jun 3, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Martin Swany wrote:
Hi All,
A) Should deliverable 2 contain the full abstract schema, including adaptations, and deliverable 3 the application of the schema to actual technologies?
I vote A. Just to reiterate, I think that we can construct the base schema without layer or technology specific information, but provide the basic building blocks for relating elements and describing the services they provide. I also don't think that it is that difficult so I don't think it will set us back time-wise.
best, martin _______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg