Re: [Nml-wg] id/idref and inverse relations

Roman Łapacz wrote:

I'm not sure that we really need to have the inverse relation in all cases. I'm not against but maybe the types like "partofSerialCompoundLink" should be treated as extensions (different namespace of attribute, eg. nml-ext:type). This way the core set of types would be minimal (its values would be the most useful and popular).

Roman, you're a proponent of allowing inverse relations. Could you give a use case why we need it in the first place? Thanks, Freek