Hi Nina, W dniu 2010-10-26 08:53, Nina Jeliazkova pisze:
On 25 October 2010 22:02, Roman Łapacz <romradz@man.poznan.pl <mailto:romradz@man.poznan.pl>> wrote:
W dniu 2010-10-25 13:22, Michael Bischoff pisze: > > - how to deal with multilayer E2E monitoring > - Streaming? there was quite some interest in this before everyone > went on vacation, not sure if it's a priority atm. (I expected more > momentum within nmc)
I don't feel too good thinking that the topic of streaming is untouched. Recently I was collecting plans for future work in GN3 project and Nina declared to work on it with you.
This is correct - I've declared I am interested in the topic, however I am not sure if there are plans how exactly to proceed.
There is no detailed plan. We've got only a topic roughly defined and initial proposal made by Michael. Let's try together prepare such plan. Roman
Best regards, Nina
Cheers, Roman
> - Others? > > With regards to multilayer E2E monitoring I'll leave that to the > experts. As I recall as we asserted that the whole thing was quite > non-trivial and full of pitfalls, I though the consensus was to > incorporate/reuse an other spec. What do you want to nail down, sort > out at OGF specifically Freek? > > Kind regards, > Michael > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Freek Dijkstra<Freek.Dijkstra@sara.nl <mailto:Freek.Dijkstra@sara.nl>> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Would there be time at the OGF upcoming week to discuss how to deal with >> multilayer E2E monitoring? >> >> Basically, we have been trying to implement something like that, but got >> stuck, since the current XML was not going to work no matter how we bend >> it. Peter Tavenier (a colleague of mine) and I asked for opinions on the >> perfsonar-dev list, explaining our rational for doing this. >> >> See: >> https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/arc/perfsonar-dev/2010-09/msg00010.html and >> more mails in that thread. >> >> Frankly, the discussion that followed in our group at SARA reminded me a >> bit on discussion we had on the NML list 3 years ago, and I'm not sure I >> want to repeat that. Also I prefer to have a slightly faster time >> progressing time. :~) >> >> So I was hoping to get some feedback how to proceed and if other share >> this interest. >> >> Regards, >> Freek >> _______________________________________________ >> Nmc-wg mailing list >> Nmc-wg@ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg@ogf.org> >> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg >> > _______________________________________________ > Nmc-wg mailing list > Nmc-wg@ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg@ogf.org> > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
_______________________________________________ Nmc-wg mailing list Nmc-wg@ogf.org <mailto:Nmc-wg@ogf.org> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg