All; On the call today we discussed the issue of result codes. There were 2 decissions: - The 2nd proposal for message structure (using namespaced datum elements) as proposed by Jeff/Martin in Munich is the way to go. - We need to see a mapping of the proposed result codes to what is currently used in pS-MDM and pS-PS services. Roman and Slawek will start this for the MDM releases, Aaron will help with the PS. Once we determine what is in use, we may prune down the list to items we need and anticipate needing in the near future. Service/Client developers - your feedback is still needed but it may be prudent to wait until the next document version. Thanks; -jason On 4/14/10 3:20 PM, Jeff W. Boote wrote:
This looks good to me, and adequately represents what I saw as the general consensus in the Room in Munich.
It would be especially important for those that were not in Munich to read/respond with their opinions. And, I'm going to call out client developers in particular. We need your feedback.
thanks, jeff
On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
On 4/14/10 3:14 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
All;
I have uploaded the updated proposal to the notes for this call:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.nmc-wg/wiki/2010041...
Please read the proposal ASAP, and be ready to discuss any additional items that must be outlined in this document. The next step will be brining this to the larger perfSONAR audience, and including it in the nmc-base document.
Thanks;
-jason
Hi,
any thoughts on this? Does the update follow what has been discussed in Munich?
Roman
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, romradz wrote:
Hi,
Updated proposal attached.
Roman