I propose to continue the discussion on merge chaining (and examples) on
NM-WG mailing list (not to leave it for far future). I'll be waiting there
for your opinions I asked ealier.

Roman



On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, Jason Zurawski wrote:

All;

On the call today everyone was in agreement that merge chaining examples

do not need to be in the NMC document.  They will continue to be

described in NM however.  If anyone disagrees, speak up now.

Thanks;

-jason

On 4/14/10 3:07 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:

Hi Roman;

I agree.  I will add this to the agenda for tomorrow.

-jason

On 4/13/10 7:12 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:

Hi Jason&  all,

I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure

that keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless

after chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they

might be used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples

presenting merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would

remove them. What do you think (see examples in the attachements)?

Roman

_______________________________________________

Nmc-wg mailing list

Nmc-wg@ogf.org

http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg

_______________________________________________
Nmc-wg mailing list
Nmc-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg