All; On the call today everyone was in agreement that merge chaining examples do not need to be in the NMC document. They will continue to be described in NM however. If anyone disagrees, speak up now. Thanks; -jason On 4/14/10 3:07 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
Hi Roman;
I agree. I will add this to the agenda for tomorrow.
-jason
On 4/13/10 7:12 AM, Roman Lapacz wrote:
Hi Jason& all,
I'm reading merge chaining examples in the base doc and I'm not sure that keeping partial metadata elements, which in my opinion are useless after chaining oparation, is a good approach. I don't believe that they might be used for any further processing. Keeping them in the examples presenting merged structures may be confusing for a reader. I would remove them. What do you think (see examples in the attachements)?
Roman