This looks good to me, and adequately represents what I saw as the general consensus in the Room in Munich. It would be especially important for those that were not in Munich to read/respond with their opinions. And, I'm going to call out client developers in particular. We need your feedback. thanks, jeff On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
On 4/14/10 3:14 PM, Jason Zurawski wrote:
All;
I have uploaded the updated proposal to the notes for this call:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.nmc-wg/wiki/2010041...
Please read the proposal ASAP, and be ready to discuss any additional items that must be outlined in this document. The next step will be brining this to the larger perfSONAR audience, and including it in the nmc-base document.
Thanks;
-jason
Hi,
any thoughts on this? Does the update follow what has been discussed in Munich?
Roman
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, romradz wrote:
Hi,
Updated proposal attached.
Roman
Nmc-wg mailing list Nmc-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg