
23 Sep
2011
23 Sep
'11
9:32 a.m.
Gang; In typing up the final version of the status codes into the document, I hit upon a snag. Here is an example of what was proposed in the prior mail: http://schemas.ogf.org/nmc/2011/09/status/informational/protocol version/ This goes against our typical method of constructing namespaces. I would suggest we do this instead: http://schemas.ogf.org/nmc/status/informational/protocol version/2011/09/ Or even better using: 201109 or 20110923 As the 'version' string. I am attaching an updated document going with the first suggestion, I prefer the last best of all. Other opinions? Thanks; -jason