> - Others?
>
> With regards to multilayer E2E monitoring I'll leave that to the
> experts. As I recall as we asserted that the whole thing was quite
> non-trivial and full of pitfalls, I though the consensus was to
> incorporate/reuse an other spec. What do you want to nail down, sort
> out at OGF specifically Freek?
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Freek Dijkstra<
Freek.Dijkstra@sara.nl> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Would there be time at the OGF upcoming week to discuss how to deal with
>> multilayer E2E monitoring?
>>
>> Basically, we have been trying to implement something like that, but got
>> stuck, since the current XML was not going to work no matter how we bend
>> it. Peter Tavenier (a colleague of mine) and I asked for opinions on the
>> perfsonar-dev list, explaining our rational for doing this.
>>
>> See:
>>
https://lists.internet2.edu/sympa/arc/perfsonar-dev/2010-09/msg00010.html and
>> more mails in that thread.
>>
>> Frankly, the discussion that followed in our group at SARA reminded me a
>> bit on discussion we had on the NML list 3 years ago, and I'm not sure I
>> want to repeat that. Also I prefer to have a slightly faster time
>> progressing time. :~)
>>
>> So I was hoping to get some feedback how to proceed and if other share
>> this interest.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Freek
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nmc-wg mailing list
>>
Nmc-wg@ogf.org
>>
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Nmc-wg mailing list
>
Nmc-wg@ogf.org
>
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg
_______________________________________________
Nmc-wg mailing list
Nmc-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmc-wg