Hi Murilo; Thank you for your email. I do want to note that the NMC group is concerned only with the protocol aspects of a measurement framework - we have to remain implementation independent as much as possible. The work that is being done here is not *only* for 'perfSONAR' services. NMC would be happy to have your (and RNPs) help in working on protocol documentation, as long as it is understood that the final product of this work will be general enough to be used by any potential framework or service, and does not reflect the needs of a specific implementation. It is very good news to hear that you are progressing on your development of a perfSONAR compliant framework, but this group does not make decisions regarding what does or does not get to be downloaded on the perfSONAR web site. You are probably better directing those requests to the perfSONAR development or users mailing lists instead - someone managing those lists will be able to address the issue of releasing a product that is 'perfSONAR' related, instead of NMC related. Hope this helps; -jason On 9/28/11 9:09 AM, thus spake murilo:
Hi Jason and all,
I just want to comment about our implementation in PHP of perfSONAR framework. It is almost done the implementation and I think after our metting that Jason will talk about perfSONAR in 2 weeks we may synchronize and deploy this implementation.
I think would be interesting to make public to download this framework in the perfSONAR website so others that would like to have access to it can deploy as well. I think after Jason's presentation, at least one person at RNP is going to follow the OGF meetings so we can follow the protocol definitions.
What do you think about it Jason? Do you think it is going to be possible?
We already have 3 services implemented with this perfSONAR flavor (MA, CLMP, CACTISonar) and it is going to be possible to make it public too.
Hope we could deploy this implementations with perfSONAR community.
Thanks all.
Murilo Vetter MonIPĂ / RNP