Hi Folks,
it seems clear that there needs to be some more
impetus to this group at GGF.
Here are a couple of ideas which we might
take forward/discuss. I'd welcome agreements/disagreements - silence is normally
golden but not on email lists!!!
Split into a healthGrid group and a life
science group (here I'm thinking of a bioinformatics Grid)
1. Let us
develop a real HealthGrid with folk who are interested in this area (I am one
and we have already built various prototype systems accessing and using
"representative" patient data sets using existing solutions across the NHS here
in Scotland).
2. Let us develop a real life science Grid. We are
interested in this and have bioinformatics data Grids and compute Grids already
in place.
Is this of interest? I think it will help to make this group
have a goal. We might want to agree on the scope of these, e.g. whether we just
want to look at exploring basic secure services for access to and usage of
healthcare data sets, incorporating anonymisation and de-anonymisation
scenarios, data linkage perhaps from patient records to imaging data
etc.
We are already working with advanced authorisation infrastructures
using results from GGF standards groups such as AuthZ and ShibGrid. This group
(in my humble opinion should be doing these kinds of things) if it is to be
"GGF". If it isn't using GGF standards and technologies then one coule argue
that it should be handled separately, e.g. through other conferences and
workshops.
What do folk think?
Rich
PS I am happy to
provide more information on what we are up to at the National e-Science Centre,
and am willing to lead/be involved in both of these Grid development activities
if there is interest from folk that it should happen. Let's do
stuff!