Hi everyone! We (Ali, Darren, Andreas and myself) have almost finished the final editoral actions to make the spec ready for public consumption, but a few minor issues remain. (My opinions on each are in parentheses.) Processor Architectures (Table 4-2 in 4.2.2.1) Should 'x86' really be called 'ia32'? (I don't really care.) Resources Element Definition (5.4.1.1) Do we need to say anything about what it means to satisfy the whole set of elements? (I think we just need to say that the Resources element is satisfied when all of its contained resource requirements are satisfied.) Do we need to say anything about what happens when you have both Total and Individual elements? (I think not...) Source and Target Element Pseudo-Schemas (5.5.6.5 and 5.5.8.5) Should the multiplicity of URI be "1" or "0-1"? Conceivably, people might want to stage to things expressed (using extensibility) as things other than URIs. (I'm inclined to say 0-1, but consistency between spec and schema is much more important.) The plan is to have a full finished version of the spec (to be revision 20) by the end-of-business on Monday, so any responses to the above points must be done *promptly*. Donal.