Karl Czajkowski wrote:
The distinction of 1 vs. 2 and 2 vs. 3 are not even on the same conceptual "axis"! [...] Where is the line drawn between "background system processes I will ignore" and "other processes that annoy me"? I think this requires some more precise QoS terminology in the job description.
I'm wondering what is the minimum we can describe in order to get a nicely usable JSDL 1.0 spec is? I do not mind if there are distinctions that we omit for 1.0 on the grounds of getting the spec done sooner rather than later, but I'll merrily admit to not understanding all the ramifications of the processor allocation models. Simple to describe and simple to implement feel like key goals to aim for to me. :-) In other words, let us finalize a version for 1.0 and then revisit the area in more detail later on if it is warranted. Donal.