Did I mess up the meeting today for the web or is the phone messed up?

Darren

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-jsdl-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-jsdl-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Karl
Czajkowski
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:45 AM
To: Donal K. Fellows
Cc: JSDL WG
Subject: Re: [jsdl-wg] Issues for todays phone conference

Yes, staging is an interesting problem.  One approach would be to have
read/write/execute rights (implied or indicated) for stage-in files
and leave it to the consumer to know if posix identity of the job
process is important to implement these rights.

For GRAM, we perform the staging "as" the target execution user, so
we'd be covered with the current proposal, I think... :-)

karl


On Apr 12, Donal K. Fellows loaded a tape reading:
...
  

The only concern about having the values inside the PosixApplication
element type (or whatever the current name is) is how to ensure that the
inward data-transfers ensure that they pick up the correct ownership
information. I don't think we express the notion of whether a job wants
to write to a staged-in file or not, which means we have to assume that
it might... :-/

Donal.
    

-- 
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr A. Stephen McGough                       http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~asm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Coordinator, London e-Science Centre, Imperial College London,
Department of Computing, 180 Queen's Gate, London SW7 2BZ, UK
tel: +44 (0)207-594-8409                        fax: +44 (0)207-581-8024
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Warden, West Wing, Beit Hall, Imperial College,
Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2BB            tel: +44 (0)207-594-9910
------------------------------------------------------------------------