Folks, thanks to Ralf, there is another typo known in the spec. Though it is not a serious mistake (it is just in an example, after all), I wonder if it is feasible to burden the GGF Editor with all these small nits and bits to update the specs. To the GGF process experts: Does GGF provide something like a maintained errata list for published specs, similar to the IETF (e.g. an errata list for HTTP/1.1)? Or do the WG have to do that themselves? What if WG have dissolved, and errata are discovered afterwards? Is there a general need to define a process for that? Cheers, Michel On 24 Mar 2006, at 11:01, Ratering, Ralf wrote:
Hi Michel&Donal,
I just noticed a minor copy/paste bug in the JSDL specs.
In the examples for the Posix extensions -51) there is:
page 50: <jsdl-posix:Input filesystemName="HOME"> output.txt </jsdl-posix:Input>
page 51: <jsdl-posix:Input filesystemName="HOME"> error.txt </jsdl-posix:Input>
it should obviously be: <jsdl-posix:Output filesystemName="HOME"> output.txt </jsdl-posix:Output>
and
<jsdl-posix:Error filesystemName="HOME"> error.txt </jsdl-posix:Error>
Besides that, I like it :-) Ralf
Ralf Ratering Intel GmbH Software & Solutions Group Hermuelheimer Strasse 8a 50321 Bruehl Germany Tel: +49 2232 209049 Fax: +49 2232 209029