
18 Mar
2005
18 Mar
'05
1:54 a.m.
I had a thought on the flight home... isn't the user and group naming really part of the POSIX executable-application type, just like the limits turned out to be? [A side comment is that they are mislabled for POSIX: userName should be a string, and UserID if it exists should be a number, etc.] If we move them to the type-specific App syntax, the User section would become empty (since we already scoped away the userCredential element). I would advocate doing this and "garbage collecting" the User element from the spec 1.0, but I am certain I do not understand others' use cases surrounding this element. Any thoughts? karl -- Karl Czajkowski karlcz@univa.com