+1 from my side. Everything else is out of scope, isn't it... -Alexander Am 01.10.2010 um 12:37 schrieb Philipp Wieder:
Count me in for work on JSDL. The question is whether we should (still can) ask Joel for a slot.
Best regards, Philipp.
Am 30.09.10 18:43, schrieb Andre Merzky:
Quoting [Andreas Savva] (Sep 30 2010):
2. Adoption of GLUE XML schema - Pending on a GLUE normative XML schema published by *OGF*. Work on this seems to have restarted recently, but I am not sure what the exact state is.
AFAIK, the GLUE WG plans to release a draft b y OGF-30.
I know people like to say 'JSDL 2.0' but, really, in the best tradition of divide-and-conquer there are a set of well-understood steps that can evolve things forward. As such I do not see the need for a BOF. I think it would actually be counterproductive because we'd go back to talking about what to do rather than doing it. The real question is whether there are people willing to work on these. A related question is whether they would be willing to work in JSDL-WG. At the last OGF it wasn't clear to me that this is the case.
+1
Cheers, Andre.
-- jsdl-wg mailing list jsdl-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/jsdl-wg