What do you mean ?

For me SAGA is on the top of many API. And SAGA was on the top of the GridRPC without data management. Now we add the data management in the GridRPC but it should be compliant to the overload of the SAGA API.

When SAGA integrated GridRPC it was not at the same level but on the top of GridRPC. SAGA is THE API of the APIs. Then I don't underst and what do you mean by using the "look and feel" of SAGA ? Could you explain ?

Nevertheless we hope this document open discussions with the SAGA WG as usual.

Best regards,

Eddy

Le 19 févr. 09 à 18:36, Steven Newhouse a écrit :

I was surprised that this document no mention of SAGA... I understood there was work going on to integrate the two APIs together at some level... or at least to utilise the SAGA 'look and feel' in future GridRPC work?

Thanks,

Steven

Dr Steven Newhouse
EGEE Technical Director
http://cern.ch/Steven.Newhouse

-----Original Message-----
From: gridrpc-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:gridrpc-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On
Behalf Of Gaël Le Mahec
Sent: 18 February 2009 16:10
To: Mailing List for GRIDRPC-WG
Subject: [GRIDRPC-WG] New version of the document

Hello,

here is the new version of the API proposal. Please feel free to
send any remark about it on the mailing list.

Best regards,

G. Le Mahec.

--
gridrpc-wg mailing list
gridrpc-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/gridrpc-wg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eddy Caron. Mcf ENS Lyon

ENS Lyon - LIP - Projet GRAAL

46 Allee d'Italie, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France

E-Mail : Eddy.Caron@ens-lyon.fr

[ Tel : 04.37.28.76.46 ][ Web page : http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~ecaron ]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------