Dear All, Thank you for the interesting discussions. Hélas, we hadn't enough time to handle all the topics that we wanted to. Here are a couple of things that we still have to discuss: - What do we decide about the terminoloy and the use of "interoperable" and "compliant"? - Do we go toward an IDL-specification? (BTW, really useful?) - Answer to the "To discuss" paragraph p. 11 of the document. - And what do we plan about the document since it has finished RFC? Furthermore, concerning the interoperability of implementations, I forgot to add some information: One can think of the handle of the data to contain the DM ID, and thus, the DM with who we deal localy can use the corresponding DM implementation if available and if needed to get data. Coming real next: - I have updates the main document to correct some oups (still some to correct in the talks). - Eddy will update the OGF28 documents on the forge (for the moment, current versions available in http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~ycaniou/Research/GridRPC/) - Eddy will send the document on the SAGA mailing-list (accordingly to a starbuck-coffee-discussion with André) - Hidemoto and I will be able to meet in Tokyo in the next weeks. We'll try to put some information on the list at that moment. Cheers. .Yves. -- Yves Caniou Associate Professor at Université Lyon 1, Member of the team project INRIA GRAAL in the LIP ENS-Lyon, Délégation CNRS in Japan French Laboratory of Informatics (JFLI), * in Information Technology Center, The University of Tokyo, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8658, Japan tel: +81-3-5841-0540 * in National Institute of Informatics 2-1-2 Hitotsubashi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 101-8430, Japan tel: +81-3-4212-2412 http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/~ycaniou/