Hi, Continuing with the previous discussions, I've finished editing the document to reflect the proposed WSDL and XSD improvements. Please see the attachment with comments. I have used Toshi's newest draft (WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b.doc) as the basis, and the current file is named as WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b+tc.doc. To see the original comment, please go https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/... Best regards, Tianchao ========================= Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:

Hi: I'm also puzzled by the reponse. As far as I know, you've posted your comment to https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/...

(As did myself and Donal) so should be fine.

Best Regards Toshi

...

Hi,

I've got the following responses after posting my proposal, which makes me feeling lost. What is the correct response to this question?

Best regards, Tianchao

------- NEC 中央研究所　主席技術主幹 中田　登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653

One correction to the exel table -- comment item 14 was actually not reflected in the schema that comes with the comment. The AgreementServiceReference property of Agreement is indeed a duplicated information of Terms->All->ServiceReference. And, AgreementServiceReference does not appear in the definition of Agreement or Template but only as a resource property of Agreement resource. So, it seems to me that this duplication is very likely a historical remnant. However, although I do not see any obvious reason for such a duplication, maybe there is. So, I did not delete them from the schema. The draft that I posted yesterday contains some typo errors as well as mistakes in the schema (sorry for that) and is updated with the new attachment (WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b+tcver2.doc). Furthermore, if we decided to remove AgreementServiceReference from the property of Agreement, we can take WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b+tcver3.doc, which further editing work has been done to remove AgreementServiceReference definition from the spec. Best regards, Tianchao Li ======================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:

Is attached. Tianchao: Thank you very much for putting your comments in the official Comments.

For Tianchao's comments, we definitely need feedback from some of the the Implementors. Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田　登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg