Here's the roadmap document for OGSA. There are references to WS-Agreement in here, so people may be interested in seeing what OGSA is saying about WS-Agreement. The link is below: https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-roadmap... --- Jim
hello: Can someone explain the exact meaning of states insitutional and evolving institutional? EG. WS-Addressing 1.0 is categorized in both institutional and evolving institutional.... Jim Pruyne wrote:
Here's the roadmap document for OGSA. There are references to WS-Agreement in here, so people may be interested in seeing what OGSA is saying about WS-Agreement. The link is below:
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-roadmap...
--- Jim
-- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)
Hi Toshi, These terms are defined in the "OGSA profile definition 1.0." https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-profile... inition/en/10 Institutional Standard An approved specification from a generally recognized standards development organization with open membership. Approved is defined by the processes of the institution in question. The specification is not expected to change without a repeat of the standardization process and this change is expected not to occur for a significant time. For example, WS-Security specification Evolving Institutional Standard A specification that is evolving toward an Institutional Standard. An active community within a recognized standards development organization is working on the specification. A specification of this status type must have an externally stable reference to the specification. For example, WSRF and WSN specifications
EG. WS-Addressing 1.0 is categorized in both institutional and evolving institutional....
Since WS-Addressing 1.0 is not yet W2C recommendation, it should be evolving institutional. Jem is now working hard to eliminate such inconsistency in the roadmap document. Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto
-----Original Message----- From: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Toshiyuki Nakata Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:28 PM To: Jim Pruyne Cc: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [graap-wg] OGSA Roadmap document
hello: Can someone explain the exact meaning of states insitutional and evolving institutional? EG. WS-Addressing 1.0 is categorized in both institutional and evolving institutional....
Jim Pruyne wrote:
Here's the roadmap document for OGSA. There are references to WS-Agreement in here, so people may be interested in seeing what OGSA is saying about WS-Agreement. The link is below:
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa- roadmap/en/
--- Jim
-- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)
Hiro: Thank you very much for your quick response. (I'll add the EIS part to what we are referring to in WS-Agreement) (And refer to the OGSA profile definition 1.0.) Best regards Toshi Hiro Kishimoto wrote:
Hi Toshi,
These terms are defined in the "OGSA profile definition 1.0." https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-profile... inition/en/10
" Institutional Standard An approved specification from a generally recognized standards development organization with open membership. Approved is defined by the processes of the institution in question. The specification is not expected to change without a repeat of the standardization process and this change is expected not to occur for a significant time.
For example, WS-Security specification
" Evolving Institutional Standard A specification that is evolving toward an Institutional Standard. An active community within a recognized standards development organization is working on the specification. A specification of this status type must have an externally stable reference to the specification.
For example, WSRF and WSN specifications
EG. WS-Addressing 1.0 is categorized in both institutional and evolving institutional....
Since WS-Addressing 1.0 is not yet W2C recommendation, it should be evolving institutional. Jem is now working hard to eliminate such inconsistency in the roadmap document.
Thanks, ---- Hiro Kishimoto
-----Original Message----- From: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Toshiyuki Nakata Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:28 PM To: Jim Pruyne Cc: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [graap-wg] OGSA Roadmap document
hello: Can someone explain the exact meaning of states insitutional and evolving institutional? EG. WS-Addressing 1.0 is categorized in both institutional and evolving institutional....
Jim Pruyne wrote:
Here's the roadmap document for OGSA. There are references to WS-Agreement in here, so people may be interested in seeing what OGSA is saying about WS-Agreement. The link is below:
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/ogsa-wg/document/draft-ggf-ogsa-
roadmap/en/
--- Jim
-- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)
-- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)
participants (3)
-
Hiro Kishimoto -
Jim Pruyne -
Toshiyuki Nakata