Re: [GRAAP-WG] New Public Comments List
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC (Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
Hi, As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file? Best regards, Tianchao Li Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis? Best wishes, Tianchao t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Hi Tianchao, the time you did sent the the WSDL the spec was already frozen except for editorial changes. As Toshi wrote you should post the changes as comment to the tracker. The public comment period ends end of November. You should use the version of the spec as base that is used for the public comments: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/downloadAttachment/projects.ggf-edi... Best regards Wolfgang Tianchao Li schrieb:
Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis?
Best wishes, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
The changes only improves specific details of WSDL and not affecting the other part of the specification document (kind of editorial changes?). But I was not sure whether I should provide the updated WSDLs as separate files or directly update the WSDL in the word file. In fact, the my post to the maillist on Oct. 5th already contains the updated WSDLs, and nobody objects these improvements but still nobody has committed to change the word file accordingly. That's why I'm proposing to change the word file directly. Regards, Tianchao Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Hi Tianchao,
the time you did sent the the WSDL the spec was already frozen except for editorial changes. As Toshi wrote you should post the changes as comment to the tracker. The public comment period ends end of November. You should use the version of the spec as base that is used for the public comments:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/downloadAttachment/projects.ggf-edi...
Best regards
Wolfgang
Tianchao Li schrieb:
Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis?
Best wishes, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
Tianchao: Please repost your proposal to https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/... (I think either an updated WSDL file or a file with just the changes should be fine.) That way, it will be officially recorded so that it can be tracked. Best Regards Toshi
The changes only improves specific details of WSDL and not affecting the other part of the specification document (kind of editorial changes?). But I was not sure whether I should provide the updated WSDLs as separate files or directly update the WSDL in the word file. In fact, the my post to the maillist on Oct. 5th already contains the updated WSDLs, and nobody objects these improvements but still nobody has committed to change the word file accordingly. That's why I'm proposing to change the word file directly.
Regards, Tianchao
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Hi Tianchao,
the time you did sent the the WSDL the spec was already frozen except for editorial changes. As Toshi wrote you should post the changes as comment to the tracker. The public comment period ends end of November. You should use the version of the spec as base that is used for the public comments:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/downloadAttachment/projects.ggf-edi...
Best regards
Wolfgang
Tianchao Li schrieb:
Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis?
Best wishes, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC
(Thank you very much Andreas!) so posting again in case someone else also tries... Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > graap-wg mailing list > graap-wg@ogf.org > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg > >
NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Thanks for your information. I have reposted the proposal to https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listPosts/projects.ggf-editor/d... and the updated document will be provided shortly. Best wishes, Tianchao t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Tianchao: Please repost your proposal to
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/discussion/do/listTopics/projects.ggf-editor/...
(I think either an updated WSDL file or a file with just the changes should be fine.)
That way, it will be officially recorded so that it can be tracked.
Best Regards Toshi
The changes only improves specific details of WSDL and not affecting the other part of the specification document (kind of editorial changes?). But I was not sure whether I should provide the updated WSDLs as separate files or directly update the WSDL in the word file. In fact, the my post to the maillist on Oct. 5th already contains the updated WSDLs, and nobody objects these improvements but still nobody has committed to change the word file accordingly. That's why I'm proposing to change the word file directly.
Regards, Tianchao
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Hi Tianchao,
the time you did sent the the WSDL the spec was already frozen except for editorial changes. As Toshi wrote you should post the changes as comment to the tracker. The public comment period ends end of November. You should use the version of the spec as base that is used for the public comments:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/sfmain/do/downloadAttachment/projects.ggf-edi...
Best regards
Wolfgang
Tianchao Li schrieb:
Sure, the recommended improvements was already posted to the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html). It has been over a month and nobody seems to reject those improvements, I would like to start to have them documented. Now, the question is of course which is the latest version of the document I should work on as a basis?
Best wishes, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
Hi Tianchao : Could you please post to the official ML/or the trackers? Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
As was posted previously in the maillist (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/2006-October/000499.html), I would like to update the current document with the improved WSDL definition to address several issues. Should I directly work on this Word file?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
> Hi： Apologies for being a nuisance but > Andreas Savva-san (of Fujitsu Laboratories) has kindly taken care of the TOC > > (Thank you very much Andreas!) so > posting again in case someone else also tries... > Best Regards > Toshi > ----- > Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 > Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC > 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, > Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan > Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) > Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509) > > > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> -- >> graap-wg mailing list >> graap-wg@ogf.org >> http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg >> >> >>
NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Hi, I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification: 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type. 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type. Are there any specific reasons? Best regards, Tianchao Li ==================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen Germany http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
This was in order to make it possible for implementations which do not use WS-Notification. Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification: 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type. 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type.
Are there any specific reasons?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
==================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen Germany http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
I understand. But what do you think if we clarify in the specification to allow the usage of WS-Notification wherever appropriate? Best regards, Tianchao t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
This was in order to make it possible for implementations which do not use WS-Notification.
Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification: 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type. 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type.
Are there any specific reasons?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
==================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen Germany http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Dear Tianchao, please send this as input to the public comments. We will discuss the issue with the authors and especially wrt to interoperability issues that might arise having implementations including WS-Negotiation and such without. Best regards Wolfgang Tianchao Li schrieb:
I understand. But what do you think if we clarify in the specification to allow the usage of WS-Notification wherever appropriate?
Best regards, Tianchao
t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com wrote:
This was in order to make it possible for implementations which do not use WS-Notification.
Best Regards Toshi
Hi,
I noticed that WS-Notification is missing in the current specification: 1. notification of agreement acceptance is currently via custom port type. 2. the agreement status port does not extend the WS-Notification port type.
Are there any specific reasons?
Best regards, Tianchao Li
==================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen Germany http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
is attached. Two-three more days until the end of the comments period. Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
participants (4)
-
t-nakata＠cw.jp.nec.com -
Tianchao Li -
Toshiyuki Nakata
-
Wolfgang Ziegler