Dear all, the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.graap-wg/d... I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline. Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards Wolfgang -- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
Hi. I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency: According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms. The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id": <xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" /> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> Best regards, Dominic Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.graap-wg/d...
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done. I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one. Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
Hi Stephen, Dominic is right, this inconsistency was already mentioned several times and should have been gone since quite a while. The schema is correct, the descriptive text has to be changed. The second comment of Dominic we will change the description and the schema to make it consistent. We suggest to describe both ServiceName and Name as MANDATORY and change the Schema accordingly. If there is no objection we will make the changes tomorrow morning (11 UTC), upload the new version to the gridforge space and send it to you. Is this ok for you? Best regards Wolfgang Stephen M Pickles schrieb/wrote:
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
That's OK for me. Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Ziegler Sent: 04 April 2007 19:14 To: Stephen.Pickles@manchester.ac.uk Cc: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi Stephen,
Dominic is right, this inconsistency was already mentioned several times and should have been gone since quite a while.
The schema is correct, the descriptive text has to be changed.
The second comment of Dominic we will change the description and the schema to make it consistent. We suggest to describe both ServiceName and Name as MANDATORY and change the Schema accordingly.
If there is no objection we will make the changes tomorrow morning (11 UTC), upload the new version to the gridforge space and send it to you.
Is this ok for you?
Best regards
Wolfgang
Stephen M Pickles schrieb/wrote:
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms -- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
Dear all, we modified the spec document according to the comments of Dominic. The new version is uploaded, change tracking on. The new version can be found here: https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.graap-wg/... Best regards Wolfgang Wolfgang Ziegler schrieb/wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Dominic is right, this inconsistency was already mentioned several times and should have been gone since quite a while.
The schema is correct, the descriptive text has to be changed.
The second comment of Dominic we will change the description and the schema to make it consistent. We suggest to describe both ServiceName and Name as MANDATORY and change the Schema accordingly.
If there is no objection we will make the changes tomorrow morning (11 UTC), upload the new version to the gridforge space and send it to you.
Is this ok for you?
Best regards
Wolfgang
Stephen M Pickles schrieb/wrote:
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
Dear all, as there were no further comments on the last changes I did sent the final version to Stephen to forward it to the editor. It can be found here https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.graap-wg/... Best regards & happy Easter Wolfgang Wolfgang Ziegler schrieb/wrote:
Dear all,
we modified the spec document according to the comments of Dominic. The new version is uploaded, change tracking on.
The new version can be found here:
https://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.graap-wg/...
Best regards
Wolfgang
Wolfgang Ziegler schrieb/wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Dominic is right, this inconsistency was already mentioned several times and should have been gone since quite a while.
The schema is correct, the descriptive text has to be changed.
The second comment of Dominic we will change the description and the schema to make it consistent. We suggest to describe both ServiceName and Name as MANDATORY and change the Schema accordingly.
If there is no objection we will make the changes tomorrow morning (11 UTC), upload the new version to the gridforge space and send it to you.
Is this ok for you?
Best regards
Wolfgang
Stephen M Pickles schrieb/wrote:
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258 CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
Hi.. I suppose people are enjoying the Easter Holidays but anyway... The OGF 20 detailed session schedule is available at http://www.ogf.org/gf/event_schedule/?event_id=7 It seems the three GRAAP sessions are scheduled on the first three sessions on 7th May and the related Dynamic SLAs workshop is scheduled on the afternoon of 8th May Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
Hi: Apologies for posting a large (well 140KB) file to all the group but it seems I cannot access GridForge right now. Please find attached a **candidate** (ie not final) to fix the two problems that Dominic pointed out. To be on the safe side, I chose AgreementId rather than Id but if people are not happy about it then it can be changed back easily. Best Regards Toshi
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Hi: Somehow or other Wolfgang's email was delayed, so I had sent my previous email before seeing his email. Please ignore my previous email. Best Regards Toshi
Hi: Apologies for posting a large (well 140KB) file to all the group but it seems I cannot access GridForge right now.
Please find attached a **candidate** (ie not final) to fix the two problems that Dominic pointed out.
To be on the safe side, I chose AgreementId rather than Id but if people are not happy about it then it can be changed back easily.
Best Regards Toshi
If the group can quickly agree how to fix this inconsistency, and give me a corrected version, I could restart the GFSG review once it's done.
I would not be happy about moving the specification to proposed recommendation while it possesses known errors like this one.
Stephen
-----Original Message----- From: graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:graap-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Battre Sent: 04 April 2007 15:04 To: GRAAP-WG Subject: Re: [GRAAP-WG] Final version of the spec
Hi.
I guess it might be too late already... I think I have found another inconsistency:
According to chapter 9.4 Port Type wsag:Agreement, the Agreement has the following Resource Properties: wsag:Name, wsag:Id, wsag:Context, and wsag:Terms.
The Schema files however use "wsag:AgreementId" instead of "wsag:Id":
<xs:complexType name="AgreementPropertiesType"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="wsag:Name" minOccurs="0" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:AgreementId" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Context" /> <xs:element ref="wsag:Terms" />
</xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>
Best regards,
Dominic
Wolfgang Ziegler wrote:
Dear all,
the final version including all changes received after the one week final call period is now available here:
http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/proje cts.graap-wg/docman.root.current_drafts/doc6091/48
I will inform the area chairs and the editor that we completed the spec and are ready to move it to the editor's pipeline.
Thanks to all contributors of last changes and best regards
Wolfgang
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
------- NEC 中央研究所 主席技術主幹 中田 登志之 Toshiyuki Nakata Executive Chief Engineer Central Research Laboratories NEC Corporation +81-44-431-7653
Hi. Another (less grave) problem is in section 4.2.6.1 Guarantee Term Structure: The description of the GuaranteeTerms does not contain the (in my opinion MANDATORY) @Name attribute even though it is inherited from TermType and necessary for the GuaranteeTermStateList. You need it to refer to the GuaranteeTerms. The schema files are correct though. Best regards, Dominic
participants (5)
-
Dominic Battre -
Stephen M Pickles -
t-nakata＠cw.jp.nec.com -
Toshiyuki Nakata
-
Wolfgang Ziegler