Hi: Just in case I don't make it to the telecon (I intend to, ) Here are two more minor comments in the spec. 1)Figure 1 has a resource property named relatedAgreements. in it 2)Chapter 7 Runtime states has 7.1 Agreement States 7.2 Service Runtime States 7.3 Gurantee States Which is fine.. on the other hand Section 9.5 Port type wsag:Agreement State only has 9.5.1 Resource Property wsag:ServiceTermStateList and 9.5.2 Resource Property wsag:GuaranteeTermStateList only. Perhaps another resource property named wsag:AgreementState is necessary? And if it is confusing to have AgreementState in both Port type and Resource Property, Perhaps the Port type should be renamed to something like Port type wsag:AgreementRuntimeState? Also, 9.5's description This port type is not meant to be used as is but instead, its resource properties MAY be composed into a domain-specific Agreement port type. seems confusing for me. Best regards Toshi -- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)