One correction to the exel table -- comment item 14 was actually not reflected in the schema that comes with the comment. The AgreementServiceReference property of Agreement is indeed a duplicated information of Terms->All->ServiceReference. And, AgreementServiceReference does not appear in the definition of Agreement or Template but only as a resource property of Agreement resource. So, it seems to me that this duplication is very likely a historical remnant. However, although I do not see any obvious reason for such a duplication, maybe there is. So, I did not delete them from the schema. The draft that I posted yesterday contains some typo errors as well as mistakes in the schema (sorry for that) and is updated with the new attachment (WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b+tcver2.doc). Furthermore, if we decided to remove AgreementServiceReference from the property of Agreement, we can take WS-AgreementSpecificationDraftFinal+sp+tn+jpver.6b+tcver3.doc, which further editing work has been done to remove AgreementServiceReference definition from the spec. Best regards, Tianchao Li ======================== Research Staff Institut fuer Informatik, TU Muenchen http://www.lrr.in.tum.de/~lit Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Is attached. Tianchao: Thank you very much for putting your comments in the official Comments.
For Tianchao's comments, we definitely need feedback from some of the the Implementors. Best Regards Toshi ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- graap-wg mailing list graap-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/graap-wg