Sorry please ignore the previous question., I hadn't realized that there were two kinds of faults. <xs:complexType name="TerminalFaultType"> <xs:complexType name="ContinuingFaultType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="wsbf:BaseFaultType"/> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="ContinuingFault" type="wsag:ContinuingFaultType"/> <xs:element name="TerminalFault" type="wsag:TerminalFaultType"/> and that Continuing Fault is used while Termination Fault isn't. Best Regards Toshi Toshiyuki Nakata wrote:
Hi:For ID-26 (Terminal Fault) I looked in the comment Tracker and It seems the response is that it had been deleted..
From last night's discussion, may I understand that I would try to see if it could be resurrected to be used to give hints to the Agreement Initiator what had been wrong?
Best Regards Toshi
By: Tiziana Ferrari <https://forge.gridforum.org/users/ferrari/> Subject: TerminalFault <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1019>[ Reply ] <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1019#reply> Date: 2005-02-17
It looks like the TerminalFault defined under the agreement type schema: <xs:complexType name="TerminalFaultType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="wsbf:BaseFaultType"/> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> is not used anywhere else. Is this intentional?
By: <None> Subject: group response <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1152>[ Reply ] <https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1152#reply> Date: 2005-04-28
Correct, it has been deleted.
-- Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)