That's the formatting and picking a
namespace, not the location information issue ...
now, stick with wsag or go to graap?
What if we produce more than one spec (negotiation, claiming etc.) Propose
wsag, since more meaningful.
Heiko
-----
Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
hludwig@us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160, mob. +1 646 675 8469
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/
Jim Pruyne <jim_pruyne@hp.com> Sent by: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org
09/07/2005 02:43 PM
To
GRAAP-WG <graap-wg@gridforum.org>
cc
Subject
[graap-wg] [Fwd: Re: [ggf-office]
XML Schema locations]
Info on choosing xml namespaces is here. It's
only draft, but if we can
get compliance with this, it seems like the right thing to do.
--- Jim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: [ggf-office] XML Schema locations
Date: Wed,
07 Sep 2005 13:26:24 -0500
From: Steve
Crumb <scrumb@ggf.org>
To: Jim
Pruyne <jim_pruyne@hp.com>, office@ggf.org
References:
<431F2C5C.7090005@hp.com>
Jim,
There is a document that is nearing public comment that can be downloaded
at:
https://forge.gridforum.org/tracker/download.php?group_id=90&atid=414&file_id=655&aid=1570
I *think* this document will answer your question. If not, let me
know.
Steve
At 01:07 PM 9/7/2005, Jim Pruyne wrote:
>When writing XML Schema, we typically need to provide a URI to identify
>the schema namespace. By convention, this is usually a URL where
the
>schema is actually located so it can be downloaded by people to inspect
or
>by tooling. Does GGF have any plans to manage these URI's and
host schema
>for working groups who's specs. include XML schema? Is there
a guideline
>for how the URI should be formatted and how they are allocated to the
groups?
>
>Thanks.
>
>--- Jim
Steve Crumb
Executive Director, Global Grid Forum
+1 630-252-8610 (Office)
+1 630-915-3324 (Cell)
scrumb@ggf.org