Comment-ID	Title	Posted By	Status	Resolution/Discussion
1	Changing Offers	Toshiyuki Nakata	Resolved	Treat the normative part as correct.
2	Minor comments & asynchronous operations[ Reply ]	Takuya Araki	On discussion	Discuss on the mailing-list. (especially wrt . Having it in the protocol or having it in the bindings)
3	Semantics of related agreements ill-defined[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	On discussion	Discuss on the mailing-list. (esp. Necessity vs.keeping the spec. simple)
4	How do we know that terms are fulfilled?[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
5	Why is the termination time part of context?[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
6	ZeroOrMore needed[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
7	Specification too complex[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
8	AgreementIsProvider attribute[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
9	Related Agreements and Brokers[ Reply ]	Heiko Ludwig (GGF12)	To Be Discussed
10	Referred Specs[ Reply ]	Komori Hitoshi	To Be Discussed
11	Three "nits"	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
12	WS-Agreement spec - proposed refactoring	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
13	Consistency of WSRF ResProp. based monitoring	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
14	WS-Agreement dependent on less mature specs	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
15	Use of WS-ResourceProperties	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
16	Organisation of runtime monitoring material	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
17	No XML snippets for Resource Properties in S8	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
18	Inconsistent use of expiration / termination	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed
19	Semantics of related agreements ill-defined	Jon MacLaren	To Be Discussed