Hi: I read the updated document ( FYI Netscape doesn't seem to work IE 6.0 does...) I concentrated on the asynchorous part so, my comments opnly apply to the asynchronous part. I think Section 8 8 Acceptance Model really clears up the various scenarios.. My two cents' worth would be to comment on that 9.3 9.3 Port Type wsag:AgreementAcceptance It might be safer to mention that this is a porttype on the Agreement Initiator side.. best Regards Toshi Karl Czajkowski wrote:
Jim has kindly posted version 12 of the draft, including comments and revisions by me. The comments emphasize my concerns about the existing presentation and content of some sections.
The revisions attempt to add the extensibility needed for Jon's signature problem (without actually defining any signature-related syntax) and the "async" interfaces. I also removed the Terminate operation. I am sure there are presentation problems and inconsistencies, but hopefully this is a more concrete basis for further discussion of these proposed changes.
Please ignore the appendix entirely. The main sections are intended to be normative and the appendix is unknown older content that I did not touch.
karl
https://forge.gridforum.org/projects/graap-wg/document/WS-AgreementSpecifica...
-- Toshiyuki Nakata t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 8-22-60210)