X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
To: Christopher Dabrowski <christopher.dabrowski@nist.gov>
Cc: graap-wg@gridforum.org, owner-graap-wg@ggf.org
Subject: Re: [graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.1IBM2 August 03, 2004
From: Heiko Ludwig <hludwig@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:08:56 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML604/01/M/IBM(Build V70_M6_06302005 Beta 4|June
 30, 2005) at 08/03/2005 15:08:57,
        Serialize complete at 08/03/2005 15:08:57
X-NIST-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-MailScanner:
X-MailScanner-From: hludwig@us.ibm.com


Good point, Chris. I added a clarifying sentence to the draft explaining that diverging state information is to be dealt with specifially to a particular domain, e.g., by replication or dispute handling.

Heiko

-----
Heiko Ludwig, Dr. rer. pol.
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, PO Box 704, Yorktown, NY, 10598
hludwig@us.ibm.com, tel. +1 914 784 7160,  mob. +1 646 675 8469
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/h/hludwig/




Christopher Dabrowski <christopher.dabrowski@nist.gov>
Sent by: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org

08/03/2005 12:14 PM

To

graap-wg@gridforum.org

cc
Subject

[graap-wg] Comment on section 9, first paragraph,




All,

An additional comment on Section 9, first paragraph #2
(WORD version of document dated July 13) states:

"2 Call Back. As with the simple client-server scenario, the initiator
invokes the AgreementFactory to create a responder-side Agreement. As
additional input to the createAgreement call, the initiator passes the address
of an initiator-side Agreement representing the offer he is making. As a
result, both parties have an Agreement representing the same accepted
agreement relationship between them, to allow symmetric messaging for
monitoring and management."

Is it clear what is meant by "symmetric messaging for monitoring and
management"?  (Also appears in #4)

Points of clarification -- does this imply that there are two copies of the
agreement, one for  the client and one for the server?  If so, must
messages be exchanged to ensure these copies are consistent? 

I raised this earlier and it may have been addressed.

Sincerely,
Chris Dabrowski



Christopher Dabrowski
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
Phone: +1 301 975-3249
FAX:      +1 301 948-6213
cdabrowski@nist.gov

Christopher Dabrowski
National Institute of Standards and Technology
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970
Phone: +1 301 975-3249
FAX:      +1 301 948-6213
cdabrowski@nist.gov