Karl Czajkowski wrote:
On Mar 22, Toshiyuki Nakata loaded a tape reading:
Hi karl thank you very much for your suggestion. Just to clarify..
May I understand that
AgreementAcceptance portType is on the Agreement Initiator side and not on the Agreement Provider side?
Best Regards Toshi
Yes. It is the return signal path for a symmetric (peer-to-peer) variant of the asynchronous exchange.
If I understand correctly, except for the names and the arguments it is quite similar to what Takuya was proposing... (Please refer to the PPT to see if i am mistaken or not) |
Do you think we need an explicit responder-side polling interface too? I had hoped RP query would be enough for the ugly client-server pattern, since we can return the (Pending) Agreement EPR immediately.
If we are to rely on WS-RP, I think we can rely on the RP query. I think this matter is still under discussion (No. 15 in my Comment list) https://forge.gridforum.org/forum/message.php?msg_id=1004 Best regards Toshi
karl
-- We have moved to a new Office!! Toshiyuki Nakata ????? Internet System Laboratories NEC t-nakata@cw.jp.nec.com 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60210) Fax +81-44-431-7681 (NEC Internal 22-60219)