Hi: 1)> AgreementSchemaTypes:
wsa-Namespace is not used (should be removed)
OK.
2) wsrf-bf: fault section could be moved to wsdl, therefore eliminating the dependency to wsrf-bf in the xml-schema (only in wsdl).
I am not sure whether below could be moved to wsdl or not. Someone please comment. On the other hand, I remember someone (Karl?)pointing out that we do not need this ContinuingFaultType at all? <!-- ////// fault section --> <xs:complexType name="ContinuingFaultType"> <xs:complexContent> <xs:extension base="wsrf-bf:BaseFaultType"/> </xs:complexContent> </xs:complexType> <xs:element name="ContinuingFault" type="wsag:ContinuingFaultType"/> 3)> AgreementAcceptanceSchemaTypes:
Namespaces wsa and wsrf-bf should be removed since they were not used in the schema.
Uh.. do you mean Agreement Acceptance Port Type WSDL or Agreement State Types Schema? Best Regards Toshi. PS will there be a telecon tonight? ----- Toshiyuki Nakata 中田 登志之 Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku, Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035) Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
-----Original Message----- From: owner-graap-wg@ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg@ggf.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Ziegler Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:49 PM To: Jim Pruyne; Nakata Toshi; GRAAP-WG Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
Dear all,
Here are some comments from my colleague Oliver:
Best regards
Wolfgang
-- Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms